Tsunami hazard and mitigation analysis for bathing beaches in China based on numerical simulations

Jingming Hou Wei Lu Tingting Fan Peitao Wang

Jingming Hou, Wei Lu, Tingting Fan, Peitao Wang. Tsunami hazard and mitigation analysis for bathing beaches in China based on numerical simulations[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(12): 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2027-z
Citation: Jingming Hou, Wei Lu, Tingting Fan, Peitao Wang. Tsunami hazard and mitigation analysis for bathing beaches in China based on numerical simulations[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(12): 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2027-z

doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2027-z

Tsunami hazard and mitigation analysis for bathing beaches in China based on numerical simulations

Funds: The China-Indonesia Marine and Climate Center Development under contract No. 121152000000210003.
More Information
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  Locations of bathing beaches.

    Figure  2.  Flowchart of tsunami hazard and mitigation research.

    Figure  3.  Location of the second layers and output points.

    Figure  4.  Tsunami amplitudes at output points.

    Figure  5.  Tsunami arrival times at output points.

    Figure  6.  Maximum tsunami amplitudes of the Layer 1.

    Figure  7.  Tsunami hazard levels of bathing beaches.

    Figure  8.  Tsunami curves for output Locations A–H, after an earthquake.

    Figure  9.  The flow direction of tsunami waves.

    Figure  10.  Numerical results for seawall experiments.

    Table  1.   Magnitudes and locations of tsunami sources

    LocationLatitude, longitudeMw
    Japan Trench38.24°N, 142.37°E9.0
    Nankai Trough31.83°N, 133.50°E9.0
    Ryukyu Trench25.68°N, 128.81°E9.0
    Manila Trench18.97°N, 120.57°E9.0
    Philippine Trench13.70°N, 125.33°E9.0
    Mariana Trench12.50°N, 142.50°E9.0
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Parameters of Model A

    LayerBathymetric
    data
    Regional extentGoverning
    equation
    Spatial
    resolution
    Layer 1ETOPO25.0°–52.0°N,linear2'
    99.0°–157.0°E
    Layer 2SRTM plus1534.7°–41.6°N, nonlinear(1/4)'
    117.2°–124.9°E;
    23.1°–34.7°N,
    117.2°–123.5°E;
    17.4°–24.1°N,
    107.3°–117.1°E
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   Tsunami hazard level criteria

    Hazard levelAmplitude/mColor
    1>3red
    21–3orange
    30.3–1yellow
    4<0.3blue
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  4.   The parameters of Layer 3

    LayerBathymetric
    data
    Regional extentGoverning
    equations
    Spatial
    resolution
    Layer 3nautical
    chart
    29.8°–29.9°N,
    122.4°–122.5°E;
    nonlinear(1/32)'
    21.8°–22.0°N,
    113.2°–113.3°E;
    21.5°–21.6°N,
    111.8°–111.9°E;
    18.1°–18.3°N,
    109.5°–109.7°E
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  5.   The maximum amplitude and flow velocity of tsunami scenarios

    Bathing beachCityParametersJapan TrenchNankai TroughRyukyu TrenchManila TrenchPhilippine TrenchMariana Trench
    ZhujiajianZhoushanAmplitude/m1.14.45.20.83.25.0
    Velocity/(m·s−1)0.50.63.90.11.22.4
    DajiaowanYangjiangAmplitude/m0.40.91.46.51.42.2
    Velocity/(m·s−1)0.10.30.54.30.40.5
    FeishatanZhuhaiAmplitude/m0.50.71.17.11.21.4
    Velocity/(m·s−1)0.20.10.24.80.20.5
    YalongwanSanyaAmplitude/m0.31.01.23.50.81.1
    Velocity/(m·s−1)0.10.40.52.20.20.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  6.   Seawall experimental schemes

    Length/mWidth/mHeight (msl)/mOffshore distance/mShapeMaterial
    Scheme 1no additionsno additionsno additionsno additionsno additionsno additions
    Scheme 2703010400cuboidconcrete and plants
    703010400cuboidconcrete and plants
    703010400cuboidconcrete and plants
    703010400cuboidconcrete and plants
    Scheme 32803010400cuboidconcrete and plants
    Note: msl means mean sea level.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  7.   Numerical simulation parameters

    LayerBathymetric dataRegional extentEquationResolution
    Layer 1ETOPO25°S–52°N, 99°–157°Elinear2'
    Layer 2SRTM plus1517.4°–24.1°N, 107.3°–117.1°Enonlinear(1/4)'
    Layer 3nautical chart21.5°–21.6°N, 111.8°–111.9°Enonlinear(1/32)'
    Layer 4nautical chart21.56°–21.58°N, 111.83°–111.85°Enonlinear(1/256)'
    下载: 导出CSV
  • Apotsos A, Jaffe B, Gelfenbaum G. 2011. Wave characteristic and morphologic effects on the onshore hydrodynamic response of tsunamis. Coastal Engineering, 58(11): 1034–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.06.002
    Borrero J C, Lynett P J, Kalligeris N. 2015. Tsunami currents in ports. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(2053): 20140372
    Carrier G F, Wu T T, Yeh H. 2003. Tsunami run-up and draw-down on a plane beach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 475: 79–99. doi: 10.1017/S0022112002002653
    Chan I C, Liu P L F. 2012. On the runup of long waves on a plane beach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C8): C08006
    Feng Xingru, Yin Baoshu, Gao Song, et al. 2017. Assessment of tsunami hazard for coastal areas of Shandong Province, China. Applied Ocean Research, 62: 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.001
    Fritz H M, Phillips D A, Okayasu A, et al. 2012. The 2011 Japan tsunami current velocity measurements from survivor videos at Kesennuma Bay using LiDAR. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(7): L00G23
    Hou Jingming, Li Xiaojuan, Wang Peitao, et al. 2020a. Hazard analysis of tsunami disaster on the Maritime Silk Road. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 39(1): 74–82. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1526-z
    Hou Jingming, Yuan Ye, Li Tao, et al. 2020b. Tsunami hazard analysis for Chinese coast from potential earthquakes in the western North Pacific. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1): 967–983
    Hsu Y J, Yu S B, Loveless J P, et al. 2016. Interseismic deformation and moment deficit along the Manila subduction zone and the Philippine Fault system. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(10): 7639–7665. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013082
    Ioualalen M, Asavanant J, Kaewbanjak N, et al. 2007. Modeling the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: Case study of impact in Thailand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112(C7): C07024
    Li Linlin, Switzer A D, Chan C H, et al. 2016. How heterogeneous coseismic slip affects regional probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment: A case study in the South China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8): 6250–6272. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013111
    Li Linlin, Switzer A D, Wang Yu, et al. 2018. A modest 0.5-m rise in sea level will double the tsunami hazard in Macau. Science Advances, 4(8): eaat1180. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1180
    Liu Yingchun, Santos A, Wang S M, et al. 2007. Tsunami hazards along Chinese coast from potential earthquakes in South China Sea. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 163(1–4): 233–244
    Lopez J A. 2009. The Multiple Lines of Defense Strategy to Sustain Coastal Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research, 10054: 186–197. doi: 10.2112/SI54-020.1
    Løvholt F, Glimsdal S, Harbitz C B, et al. 2014. Global tsunami hazard and exposure due to large co-seismic slip. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10: 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.04.003
    Lunghino B, Tate A F S, Mazereeuw M, et al. 2020. The protective benefits of tsunami mitigation parks and ramifications for their strategic design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(20): 10740–10745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911857117
    Lynett P J. 2007. Effect of a shallow water obstruction on long wave runup and overland flow velocity. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 133(6): 455–462
    Lynett P J, Borrero J C, Weiss R, et al. 2012. Observations and modeling of tsunami-induced currents in ports and harbors. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 327–328: 68–74
    Madsen P A, Fuhrman D R, Schäffer H A. 2008. On the solitary wave paradigm for tsunamis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C12): C12012
    Megawati K, Shaw F, Sieh K, et al. 2009. Tsunami hazard from the subduction megathrust of the South China Sea: Part I. Source characterization and the resulting tsunami. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 36(1): 13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.11.012
    National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). 2006. 2-minute Gridded Global Relief Data (ETOPO2) v2. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. http: //doi. org/10.7289/V5J1012Q[2021-01-15]
    National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). 2021. World Data Service: NCEI/WDS Global Historical Tsunami Database. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ngdc.mgg.hazards:G02151[2021-01-15]
    Qiu Qiang, Li Linlin, Hsu Y J, et al. 2019. Revised earthquake sources along Manila trench for tsunami hazard assessment in the South China Sea. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19(7): 1565–1583. doi: 10.5194/nhess-19-1565-2019
    Ren Zhiyuan, Wang Yuchen, Wang Peitao, et al. 2020. Numerical study of the triggering mechanism of the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami: eruption or collapsed landslide?. Natural Hazards, 102(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-03907-y
    Ren Zhiyuan, Yuan Ye, Wang Peitao, et al. 2017. The September 16, 2015 MW 8.3 Illapel, Chile Earthquake: characteristics of tsunami wave from near-field to far-field. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(5): 73–82. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1005-3
    Sun Liguang, Zhou Xin, Huang Wen, et al. 2013. Preliminary evidence for a 1000-year-old tsunami in the South China Sea. Scientific Reports, 3(1): 1655. doi: 10.1038/srep01655
    Syamsidik, Benazir, Luthfi M, et al. 2020. The 22 December 2018 Mount Anak Krakatau volcanogenic tsunami on Sunda Strait coasts, Indonesia: tsunami and damage characteristics. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(2): 549–565. doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-549-2020
    Tonkin S, Yeh H, Kato F, et al. 2003. Tsunami scour around a cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 496: 165–192. doi: 10.1017/S0022112003006402
    Tozer B, Sandwell D T, Smith W H F, et al. 2019. Global bathymetry and topography at 15 arc sec: SRTM15+. Earth and Space Science, 6(10): 1847–1864. doi: 10.1029/2019EA000658
    Wang Xiaoming. 2009. User manual for COMCOT version 1.7 (first draft). Ithaca, NY: Cornel University, 65
    Wang Xiaoming, Liu P L F. 2006. An analysis of 2004 Sumatra earthquake fault plane mechanisms and Indian Ocean tsunami. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 44(2): 147–154. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521671
    Wang Peitao, Ren Zhiyuan, Sun Lining, et al. 2021. Observations and modelling of the travel time delay and leading negative phase of the 16 September 2015 Illapel, Chile tsunami. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 40(11): 11–30. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1830-2
    Wang Peitao, Yu Fujiang, Zhao Lianda, et al. 2012. Numerical analysis of tsunami propagating generated by the Japan MW 9.0 earthquake on Mar. 11 in 2011 and its impact on China coasts. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(9): 3088–3096
    Wei Yong, Chamberlin C, Titov V V, et al. 2013. Modeling of the 2011 Japan tsunami: lessons for near-field forecast. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170(6–8): 1309–1331
    Wilson R, Davenport C, Jaffe B. 2012. Sediment scour and deposition within harbors in California (USA), caused by the March 11, 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami. Sedimentary Geology, 282: 228–240. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2012.06.001
    Zhang Mingliang, Ji Yongpeng, Wang Yini, et al. 2020. Numerical investigation on tsunami wave mitigation on forest sloping beach. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 39(1): 130–140. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1527-y
    Zhao Xi, Liu Hua, Wang Benlong. 2013. Evolvement of tsunami waves on the continental shelves with gentle slope in the China Seas. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 3(3): 032005. doi: 10.1063/2.1303205
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  603
  • HTML全文浏览量:  187
  • PDF下载量:  35
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-01-11
  • 录用日期:  2022-04-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-08-17
  • 刊出日期:  2022-12-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回