Subthermocline eddies carrying the Indonesian Throughflow water observed in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean
-
Abstract: We observed a subthermocline eddy (STE) with a cold and fresh core during an observation cruise along a transect of 10°S in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean (SETIO) in December 2017. The vertical scale, speed radius, and maximum swirl velocity of the STE were about 200 m, 55 km, and 0.5 m/s, respectively. The mean Rossby number and Burger number of the STE were then estimated to be about −0.7 and 2.4, indicating the STE was a submesoscale coherent vortex. The STE core water had characteristics of the Indonesian Throughflow (ITF) water and was distinct from that of surrounding areas. By examining Argo float data, another STE was well captured by five successive profiles of the same Argo float. Both STEs showed significant temperature and salinity anomalies at the σ0=26.0–26.5 kg/m3 surfaces. With the assumption that the low-salinity ITF water parcels could be carried only by surface eddies and the STEs, the Argo profiles, which detected low-salinity ITF water and were located outside a surface eddy, were believed to be inside an STE and were used to analyze the distribution, origin, and generation mechanism of the STE. The results suggested that the STEs carrying ITF water may be generated under topography-current interaction at the eastern coastal waters or under front-induced subduction in the area away from coastal waters. Those STEs may be widely distributed in the SETIO and may play a role in ITF water parcel transport.
-
Figure 1. Schematic showing the zonal transection of surface and subsurface eddies (in the northern hemisphere). The blue lines indicate the sea-level anomaly. The black lines indicate the isopycnals. The color shading indicates the meridional current velocity generated by eddies. The white dots and crosses indicate the southward and northward current directions, respectively.
Figure 2. The observation area and the sea-level anomaly (SLA) during observation. a. Map of the observation area in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean. Black contours indicate the 200-m isobath. b. Color codes showing the SLA on December 3, 2017. Black solid and dashed contours show the outermost enclosed SLA isolines of the surface anticyclonic eddy (AE) and cyclonic eddy (CE), respectively. Black arrows represent geostrophic current vectors. Red arrows show the current vectors measured by vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (VADCP) at the 33-m depth (first layer). The red triangles represent the Conductivity-Temperature-Depth stations. The red circle in a and b represents the location of the cruise-observed subthermocline eddy. The red straight lines in a and b represent the transect for VADCP observation. ITF: Indonesian Throughflow.
Figure 3. Vertical distribution of the current velocity and the Rossby number. a. Meridional velocity measured along the vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (VADCP) transect. Blue and red dashed boxes represent the western and eastern sides of the surface anticyclonic eddy (AE), respectively. The black dashed box endorses the cruise-observed subthermocline eddy (STE). Blue and red vertical lines show positions of maximum southward and northward velocities, respectively. Locations of Conductivity-Temperature-Depth stations are denoted at the top of the panel. b and c are the same as a, but for the zonal velocity and the Rossby number Ro, respectively. d. The blue and red lines represent the horizontally averaged meridional velocity profiles of the western and eastern sides of the AE, respectively. e. The blue and red lines represent the STE-induced meridional velocity anomaly (the VADCP-measured velocity minus the horizontally averaged meridional velocity profiles of the eastern side of the AE) at the position marked by the blue and red lines in a, respectively. f. Vertical distribution of the Ro averaged between the blue and red lines indicated in a and c. The two horizontal dashed lines indicate the e-folding vertical length scale of the STE.
Figure 4. Vertical distribution of the temperature, salinity, and their anomalies. a. Depth-longitude plot of water temperature observed along the Conductivity-Temperature-Depth transect. The black contours represent the isothermals of 11℃, 13℃, 16℃, and 20℃. The white contours from up and down denote isopycnals of 25 σ0, 26 σ0, and 26.50 σ0, respectively. The thick (thin) blue and red contours indicate the subthermocline eddy (STE)-induced meridional velocity anomaly isolines of −0.3 m/s (−0.2 m/s) and 0.3 m/s (0.2 m/s), respectively. The black dashed box shows the cruise-observed STE area. Observation station locations are denoted at the panel top. The image in b is the same as the image a, but for the salinity. Black contour represents the isohaline of 34.55. c. The temperature anomaly generated by the cruise-observed STE, that is, the temperature at s-1 minus that at s-4. The image in d is the same as image c, but for the salinity anomaly.
Figure 5. The background salinity and potential temperature and salinity (T-S) diagrams of observation and background. a. Annual mean salinity distribution of the BOA_ARGO on the 26.0 σ0 surface in the south Indian Ocean. The red circle represents the location of the cruise-observed subthermocline eddy (STE). b. Depth-longitude plot of annual mean salinity of the BOA_ARGO along 10°S. The black bar represents the location of the cruise-observed STE. The white contours from top to bottom represent the isopycnals of 25.0 σ0, 26.0 σ0, and 26.5 σ0, respectively. The red contour in a and b represent isohaline of 34.55 (isohaline of 34.55 was discontinuous in a because of the annual mean Argo data that was unavailable near the coast). c. T-S diagrams of water mass within the areas of red and green dashed boxes in a are shown as red and green shadings, respectively. The red dotted line shows the T-S distribution in the cruise-observed STE center (station s-1), and the blue dotted line represents the results measured out of the STE (station s-4). The contours show the potential density. The vertical dashed line indicates the isohaline of 34.55.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution and potential temperature and salinity (T-S) diagrams of the identified low-salinity Argo profiles. a. Spatial distribution of the identified low-salinity Argo profiles (black dots). The red and green dots show the location of the cruise- and Argo-observed subthermocline eddy (STE), respectively. The color codes show the topography. b. T-S plot. The gray dots represent the T-S distribution of the identified low-salinity Argo profiles corresponding to the black dots in a. Red and green dotted lines show the observed T-S distributions within the cruise-observed (at station s-1) and Argo-observed (on March 26, 2006) STE, respectively.
Figure 7. The Argo float trajectory and the sea-level anomaly (SLA). The yellow line indicates the trajectory of the Argo float with platform number 5900860. The red part indicates the position where the Argo-observed subthermocline eddy (STE) was detected. Color codes show SLA on March 26, 2006, when the Argo float was at the location indicated by the red star (also in the inset). Black arrows represent geostrophic current vectors. Black solid and dashed contours show the outermost enclosed SLA isolines of the surface anticyclonic eddy and cyclonic eddy, respectively. The red circle indicates the cruise-observed STE. The observation area is shown in an inset on the bottom right corner. ITF: Indonesian Throughflow.
Figure 8. Depth-time plots of temperature (a) and salinity (b) of the Argo-observed STE. Black contours denote isotherms of 16℃, 13℃, and 11℃ in a, and isohalines of 34.55 in b, respectively. White contours denote isopycnals of 25 σ0, 26 σ0, and 26.50 σ0. c and d are the temperature and salinity anomalies generated by the Argo-observed STE (the temperature and salinity observed in the STE, minus those observed out of the STE).
Figure 9. The relative locations between low-salinity profiles (LSPs) and surface eddies and the distribution of different LSPs. a–d. Examples showing the relative locations between LSPs and surface eddies. The white stars indicate the positions of LSPs. The green and red circles indicate the adjacent surface cyclonic eddy (CE) and anticyclonic eddy (AE), respectively. Color codes show sea-level anomaly (SLA) on the day indicated in the upper left corner. a. The two stars indicate the stations s-1 and s-2, which are located inside the cruise-observed subthermocline eddy (STE) and outside of the adjacent surface CE. The white points indicate stations s-3, s-4, and s-5 from left to right. b. The star indicates the LSP located inside the Argo-observed STE and outside of adjacent surface eddies. c. An LSP, captured by Argo float with platform number 5900462, is located inside a surface CE. d. An LSP, captured by Argo float with platform number 5905018, is located inside a surface AE. e. The distribution of LSPs located inside surface CEs, AEs, and outside the surface eddies. The color codes show the eddy kinetic energy (EKE).
Figure 10. The zonal distribution of low-salinity profiles (LSPs). a. The blue, red, and yellow bars show the zonal distribution of the number of LSPs located inside cyclonic eddys (CEs), anticyclonic eddys (AEs), and outside of surface eddies, respectively. The green line indicates the zonal distribution of the number of the total Argo profiles. The zonal bin is 2°. b. The blue, red, and yellow bars show the percentage of LSPs located inside CEs, AEs, and outside of surface eddies in the total Argo profiles. The green line indicates the ratio of the LSPs located outside surface eddies (OP) to that located inside surface eddies (IP). The green line becomes a dotted line when the Argo float number is relatively small. The black line indicates the eddy kinetic energy (EKE) along 10°S.
-
Babanin A V. 2006. On a wave-induced turbulence and a wave-mixed upper ocean layer. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(20): L20605. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027308 Baird M E, Ridgway K R. 2012. The southward transport of sub-mesoscale lenses of Bass Strait Water in the centre of anti-cyclonic mesoscale eddies. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(2), Bashmachnikov I, Neves F, Calheiros T, et al. 2015. Properties and pathways of Mediterranean water eddies in the Atlantic. Progress in Oceanography, 137: 149–172. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.06.001 Brainerd K E, Gregg M C. 1993. Diurnal restratification and turbulence in the oceanic surface mixed layer: 1. Observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(C12): 22645–22656. doi: 10.1029/93JC02297 Brannigan L, Marshall D P, Garabato A C N, et al. 2017. Submesoscale instabilities in mesoscale eddies. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 47(12): 3061–3085. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-16-0178.1 Chelton D B, DeSzoeke R A, Schlax M G, et al. 1998. Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 28(3): 433–460. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0433:GVOTFB>2.0.CO;2 Chelton D B, Schlax M G, Samelson R M. 2011. Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Progress in Oceanography, 91(2): 167–216. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002 Contreras M, Pizarro O, Dewitte B, et al. 2019. Subsurface mesoscale eddy generation in the ocean off central chile. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124(8): 5700–5722. doi: 10.1029/2018JC014723 D’Asaro E A. 1988. Generation of submesoscale vortices: A new mechanism. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 93(C6): 6685–6693. doi: 10.1029/JC093iC06p06685 Feng Ming, Wijffels S. 2002. Intraseasonal variability in the south equatorial current of the East Indian Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32(1): 265–277. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0265:IVITSE>2.0.CO;2 Godfrey J S. 1996. The effect of the Indonesian Throughflow on ocean circulation and heat exchange with the atmosphere: A review. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 101(C5): 12217–12237. doi: 10.1029/95JC03860 Gordon A L, Susanto R D, Vranes K. 2003. Cool Indonesian Throughflow as a consequence of restricted surface layer flow. Nature, 425(6960): 824–828. doi: 10.1038/nature02038 Hu Zhentao, Ma Xiao, Peng Yingyu, et al. 2022. A large subsurface anticyclonic eddy in the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127(3): e2021JC018130. doi: 10.1029/2021JC018130 Huang Xiaolong, Jing Zhiyou, Zheng Ruixi, et al. 2020. Dynamical analysis of submesoscale fronts associated with wind-forced offshore jet in the western South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 39(11): 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13131-020-1671-4 Huang Chuanjiang, Qiao Fangli. 2010. Wave-turbulence interaction and its induced mixing in the upper ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 115(C4): C04026. doi: 10.1029/2009JC005853 Huang Chuanjiang, Qiao Fangli, Dai Dejun, et al. 2012. Field measurement of upper ocean turbulence dissipation associated with wave-turbulence interaction in the South China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C11): C00J09. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007806 Kurian J, Colas F, Capet X, et al. 2011. Eddy properties in the California Current System. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 116(C8): C08027. doi: 10.1029/2010JC006895 Li Hong, Xu Fanghua, Zhou Wei, et al. 2017a. Development of a global gridded Argo data set with Barnes successive corrections. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(2): 866–889. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012285 Li Cheng, Zhang Zhiwei, Zhao Wei, et al. 2017b. A statistical study on the subthermocline submesoscale eddies in the northwestern Pacific Ocean based on Argo data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(5): 3586–3598. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012561 Makarim S, Sprintall J, Liu Zhiyu, et al. 2019. Previously unidentified Indonesian Throughflow pathways and freshening in the Indian Ocean during recent decades. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 7364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43841-z Mcwilliams J C. 2016. Submesoscale currents in the ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2189): 20160117, Nagai T, Tandon A, Yamazaki H, et al. 2012. Direct observations of microscale turbulence and thermohaline structure in the Kuroshio Front. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C8): C08013. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007228 Nof D, Pichevin T, Sprintall J. 2002. “Teddies” and the origin of the leeuwin current. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32(9): 2571–2588. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<2571:TATOOT>2.0.CO;2 Pelland N A, Eriksen C C, Lee C M. 2013. Subthermocline eddies over the Washington continental slope as observed by seagliders, 2003–09. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43(10): 2025–2053. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-12-086.1 Qiao Fangli, Yuan Yeli, Deng Jia, et al. 2016. Wave–turbulence interaction-induced vertical mixing and its effects in ocean and climate models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065): 20150201, Qiao Fangli, Yuan Yeli, Yang Yongzeng, et al. 2004. Wave-induced mixing in the upper ocean: Distribution and application to a global ocean circulation model. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(11): L11303. doi: 10.1029/2004GL019824 Sarkar S, Pham H T, Ramachandran S, et al. 2016. The interplay between submesoscale instabilities and turbulence in the surface layer of the bay of Bengal. Oceanography, 29(2): 146–157. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2016.47 Shapiro G I, Meschanov S L. 1991. Distribution and spreading of Red Sea Water and salt lens formation in the northwest Indian Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 38(1): 21–34. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(91)90052-H Song Qian, Gordon A L, Visbeck M. 2004. Spreading of the Indonesian Throughflow in the Indian Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34(4): 772–792. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0772:SOTITI>2.0.CO;2 Song Bo, Wang Huizan, Chen Changlin, et al. 2019. Observed subsurface eddies near the Vietnam coast of the South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(4): 39–46. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1412-8 Spall M A. 1995. Frontogenesis, subduction, and cross-front exchange at upper ocean fronts. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(C2): 2543–2557. doi: 10.1029/94JC02860 Spall M A, Price J F. 1998. Mesoscale variability in Denmark Strait: The PV outflow hypothesis. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 28(8): 1598–1623. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<1598:mvidst>2.0.co;2 Sprintall J, Wijffels S E, Molcard R, et al. 2009. Direct estimates of the Indonesian Throughflow entering the Indian Ocean: 2004–2006. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 114(C7): C07001. doi: 10.1029/2008JC005257 Valsala V K, Ikeda M. 2007. Pathways and effects of the Indonesian Throughflow water in the Indian Ocean using particle trajectory and tracers in an OGCM. Journal of Climate, 20(13): 2994–3017. doi: 10.1175/JCLI4167.1 Van Sebille E, Sprintall J, Schwarzkopf F U, et al. 2014. Pacific-to-Indian Ocean connectivity: Tasman leakage, Indonesian Throughflow, and the role of ENSO. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(2): 1365–1382. doi: 10.1002/2013JC009525 Wang Lu, Zhou Lei, Xie Lingling, et al. 2019. Seasonal and interannual variability of water mass sources of Indonesian Throughflow in the Maluku Sea and the Halmahera Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(4): 58–71. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1413-7 Yang Guang, Yu Weidong, Yuan Yeli, et al. 2015. Characteristics, vertical structures, and heat/salt transports of mesoscale eddies in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(10): 6733–6750. doi: 10.1002/2015JC011130 Yang Guang, Zhao Xia, Li Yuanlong, et al. 2019a. Chlorophyll variability induced by mesoscale eddies in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean. Journal of Marine Systems, 199: 103209. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.103209 Yang Qingxuan, Zhao Wei, Liang Xinfeng, et al. 2017. Elevated mixing in the periphery of mesoscale eddies in the South China Sea. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 47(4): 895–907. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-16-0256.1 Yang Guangbing, Zheng Quanan, Xiong Xuejun, et al. 2019b. Subsurface cyclonic eddies observed in the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124(10): 7247–7260. doi: 10.1029/2019JC015381 Yang Guangbing, Zheng Quanan, Yuan Yeli, et al. 2019c. Effect of a mesoscale eddy on surface turbulence at the Kuroshio Front in the East China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124(3): 1763–1777. doi: 10.1029/2018JC014672 Zhang Zhiwei, Li Peiliang, Xu Lixiao, et al. 2015. Subthermocline eddies observed by rapid-sampling Argo floats in the subtropical northwestern Pacific Ocean in Spring 2014. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(15): 6438–6445. doi: 10.1002/2015GL064601 Zhang Zhiwei, Liu Zhiyu, Richards K, et al. 2019. Elevated diapycnal mixing by a subthermocline eddy in the western equatorial Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(5): 2628–2636. doi: 10.1029/2018GL081512 Zhang Zhengguang, Wang Wei, Qiu Bo. 2014. Oceanic mass transport by mesoscale eddies. Science, 345(6194): 322–324. doi: 10.1126/science.1252418 Zhang Xincheng, Zhang Zhiwei, McWilliams J C, et al. 2022. Submesoscale coherent vortices observed in the northeastern South China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127(2): e2021JC018117. doi: 10.1029/2021JC018117 Zhang Zhengguang, Zhang Yu, Wang Wei. 2017. Three-compartment structure of subsurface-intensified mesoscale eddies in the ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(3): 1653–1664. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012376 Zheng Quanan, Lin Hui, Meng Junmin, et al. 2008. Sub-mesoscale ocean vortex trains in the Luzon Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C4): C04032. doi: 10.1029/2007JC004362 Zheng Quanan, Xie Lingling, Xiong Xuejun, et al. 2020. Progress in research of submesoscale processes in the South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 39(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1521-4 Zhou Lei, Murtugudde R, Jochum M. 2008. Seasonal influence of Indonesian Throughflow in the southwestern Indian Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38(7): 1529–1541. doi: 10.1175/2007JPO3851.1 Zhurbas V, Stipa T, Mälkki P, et al. 2004. Generation of subsurface cyclonic eddies in the southeast Baltic Sea: Observations and numerical experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C5): C05033. doi: 10.1029/2003JC002074